The lessons in the Ghita are ones that set out to include and help. This seems pretty unique in that most other religions require one to relinquish parts of their lives in order to join them. Hinduism almost doesn't seem like a religion in that sense because it is all-inclusive. Whatever you want to do, that's fine by the Ghita, so long as you are fulfilling your Dharma. One aspect that I found particularly interesting in this sense was the idea that Krishna wanted Arjuna to fulfill his Dharma as a Kshatrya, and defeat his enemies. Because it was his Dharma, he would not be punished for it, and he could expect to "move up" in his next life.
I understand that there is a great likelihood that Arjuna was not actually intended to kill his enemies, and that it is a metaphor for defeating the personal demons within us (or something along those lines) that will allow us to reach Moksha, yet at the same time it offers strange grounds for potentially atrocious acts simply because the individuals acting them out can claim that it is their Dharma to do so, and they aren't in fact "killing" anyone, because the self cannot be killed.
Thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment